[ Upstream commit f54aa97fb7e5329a373f9df4e5e213ced4fc8759 ]
The condition determining whether the preallocation can be used had
an off-by-one error so we didn't discard preallocation when new
allocation was just following it. This can then confuse code in
inode_getblk().
CC: stable@vger.kernel.org
Fixes: 16d055656814 ("udf: Discard preallocation before extending file with a hole")
Signed-off-by: Jan Kara <jack@suse.cz>
Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@kernel.org>
9ee18ff099