padata: switch padata_find_next() to using cpumask_next_wrap()

Calling cpumask_next_wrap_old() with starting CPU == -1 effectively means
the request to find next CPU, wrapping around if needed.

cpumask_next_wrap() is the proper replacement for that.

Acked-by: Herbert Xu <herbert@gondor.apana.org.au>
Acked-by: Daniel Jordan <daniel.m.jordan@oracle.com>
Signed-off-by: Yury Norov <yury.norov@gmail.com>
This commit is contained in:
Yury Norov 2025-01-28 11:46:37 -05:00
parent 566babe82b
commit f954a2d376

View File

@ -290,7 +290,7 @@ static struct padata_priv *padata_find_next(struct parallel_data *pd,
if (remove_object) {
list_del_init(&padata->list);
++pd->processed;
pd->cpu = cpumask_next_wrap_old(cpu, pd->cpumask.pcpu, -1, false);
pd->cpu = cpumask_next_wrap(cpu, pd->cpumask.pcpu);
}
spin_unlock(&reorder->lock);